Chapter: 10

Period: from the 8th of May to the 14th of May

Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 15:30:39 No.54962736
cover_image

Seeing as its Sunday, here's a question for those reading The Sovereign Individual. The book talks a lot about businesses and entities which can operate completely digitally, but it doesn't mention much about the flow of material goods between jurisdictions, or about location dependent organizations such as manufacturing and farming.

Will manufacturing and consuming of goods be more locally based than it is now with global shipping diminishing in scale due to the lack of nation state protection? Will the level of consumption go down in general? And when it comes to the manufacturing of crucial items such as semiconductors, will these operations be centralized to certain jurisdictions like it is now, or will fabs become widespread across the globe?


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 16:05:53 No.54962960
>>54962736

>it doesn't mention much about the flow of material goods between jurisdictions, or about location dependent organizations such as manufacturing and farming.

Yes it does.


cover_image >>54962736

I was thinking about 3D printing when reading that section


OP

Anonymous (ID: hjcFtC2X) 05/07/23(Sun) 18:18:02 No.54882660
cover_image

/XMR/ general weekly book club - WEEK 5 being late edition


This is the fifth week of the book club, with chapter 10 of the book "The Sovereign Individual" by Sir William Rees-Mogg and James Dale Davidson.


Now a brief (but not comprehensive enough) description of the chapter:

>Chapter 10: The twilight of democracy

>It is no secret that democracy has been relatively rare and, fleeting in the history of governments. In those times, ancient and modem, where democracy has prevailed, it has depended for its success upon megapolitical conditions that reinforced the military power and importance of the masses.

Getting close to the end of the book, the authors choose to tackle the (non)issue of what future governance might look like. Building on previous chapters, modern democracy arose as the most efficient manner of extracting the most amount of resources out of its citizens. The rise of mass-democracy was no doubt a megapolicial phenomena as well, that is bound to be altered to skew towards market choice. This was hinted at previously with the "governments for customers", however now the dichotomy between economic and political choice becomes clear. And to ultimately answer the question, the book poses the example that a customer shopping for a new pair of jeans does not care if the seller is a LLC, publicly trader or held by insiders, he only cares about how it'll serve him for what cost. The authors expect the same to happen with people "shopping for sovereignties"


Questions:

1. This chapter says a neo-luddite reaction will include proposing "stakeholder capitalism". I'd argue that this is clear that such sentiments are rising among "leftist politics" with UBI or on the more extreme spectrum accelerationism (both sides). Is this happening, or just a momentary trend. If the rising political solution is increasingly non-political, will there be a violent infliction point of this trend when it comes to fully embrace the new dynamics of the world?

2. The later part of the chapter provides a direct link between the rise of large corporations and the megapolitical conditions of the Industrial Age with with the inability for market forces to penetrate intrafirm relationships. From this follows the rise of "virtual corporation", which is already happening with tech companies. Which tools, if any, would be necessitated for other sectors to follow suit?


Also as a sidenote I'd like to mention how the book lays the case for assets being out of control of governments and financial transactions being untraceable. It quite literally spells it out

>the reactionaries of the new millennium will find the financial privacy facilitated by information technology especially threatening

So it is really ironic to see Bitcoin maximalists talk praise this book, not realizing the irony that Monero is closer to the financial technologies described that Bitcoin ever was.

But as always, feel encouraged to share your own thoughts, opinions, or summaries.

Now going for chapter 11 ending by the 21st of May. The site will be updated now on Tuesday morning with this post and discussions to leave a bit more space. See previous weeks' ones at.

>https://xmrbookclub.neocities.org/sig/week4.html

>https://xmrbookclub.neocities.org/sig/week3.html

>https://xmrbookclub.neocities.org/sig/week2.html

>https://xmrbookclub.neocities.org/sig/week1.html

>https://xmrbookclub.neocities.org/sig/index.html


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 18:49:40 No.54964153
>>54964039

>So it is really ironic to see Bitcoin maximalists talk praise this book, not realizing the irony

Turns out I'm having a stroke, meant

>It is really ironic to see Bitcoin maximalists praise this book without realizing the fact that Monero is closer to financial technologies described in the book that Bitcoin ever was


>Will manufacturing and consuming of goods be more locally based than it is now with global shipping diminishing in scale due to the lack of nation state protection? Will the level of consumption go down in general? And when it comes to the manufacturing of crucial items such as semiconductors, will these operations be centralized to certain jurisdictions like it is now, or will fabs become widespread across the globe?

I think this connects quite aptly to this weeks chapter.

>This is more than merely a theory, [..] there is no essential reason that social services and many public goods must be provided by political means.

Currently, the status-quo is the USA army and in specific the Navy secures most of international commerce so that individual countries need not have a standing strong navy that ventures out from their own waters. There are two issues with this stemming from newer conditions. Firstly, alternative transport routes are widely used, such as "shipping" by airplanes or digital transmissions. Also with 3d printing becoming better I'd say it is perfectly reasonable to expect custom goods to be purchased either from a human or robotic designer and then have them printed and assembled locally.

Secondly, as citizens transform into customers (or at least the luckier ones) some might expect global physical protection services on their actives. Alternatively, it might not even be the national army that will provide that, but rather private firms as hinted by the above paragraph. Libertarian authors during the past century have done a great deal of demonstrating market-based solutions for "public" services.


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 19:37:19 No.54964502
>>54964153

What authors provide that to be honest it feels so dystopian if there isn't a goverment that controls basic services like water and security i mean i want globalization to dissapear and be excited to see a gameplay of nomad gangs but i don't think the world should devolve into some some form of anarchic violence just imagine if all the ships of the american army were privatized it sounds more dangerous


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 20:34:45 No.54964992
>>54963452 >>54964153

Thanks for the replies,

Yeah it seems that 3d printing would be a cornerstone of such a future, making it easier to produce goods locally to avoid the higher costs of shipping.

Imagine a manufacturing facility which could spit out basically anything you tell it to, only requiring raw materials and the most highly complex components to be shipped in.

Maybe that's a stretch, but still its easy to adopt a normalcy bias and forget that tech is rapidly advancing and outdating today's practices. Many things which seem normal and smart now will be laughably anachronistic in the future.


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 22:25:27 No.54966054
>>54903995

This is a fantasy.


No crypto can substitute fiat currencies for mass transactions in internal and global markets.


At best they can have their niche use (like Monero in DNMs) and that's it.


So no, there will be dissolution of nation states and other similar organizations.


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 22:26:55 No.54966066
>>54966054

there will be no* dissolution


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 22:30:17 No.54966095
cover_image

Any books similar to The Sovereign Individual?


Anonymous 05/14/23(Sun) 22:35:33 No.54966136
>>54966095

Anyone whos had a reptile pet will immediately realize how disgusting it is to be treated like an animal. Yea give me some egg cartons with crickets for me and my lizard. Maybe this is a jewish thing, theyre compared to lizards sometimes.


Anonymous 05/15/23(Mon) 03:48:59 No.54968530
>>54966095

I was thinking about the next book we read, what do anons think about Wealth of Nations? Any other ideas? Something discussing different economic/monetary theories would be great


Anonymous 05/15/23(Mon) 11:13:53 No.54971083
>>54968530

>I was thinking about the next book we read, what do anons think about Wealth of Nations?

I would say wealth of nations would be a heavy book.

>Any other ideas?

Democracy The God That Failed, by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.


We need to get rid of us from the stupid idea that is democracy.


Anonymous 05/15/23(Mon) 18:44:16 No.54975310
cover_image >>54955254

It was funny to read that, but keep in mind that the concrete predictions do not really work as the authors have no idea what the technology of the future might be. A great example of this is how they envision digital cash as being backed by physical gold. Unbeknownst to them, digital scarcity would be first achieved with Bitcoin. And the list keeps going, 3d printing (including 3d printed firearms), internet centralization, problems with online identity verification, torrenting, whistleblowers all seem like trends that the authors simply couldn't have been aware of.


>>54966095

You might enjoy early chyperpunk writings as they have similar themes but with a clearly formulated ambition. The cyhperpunk manifesto is in the OP for starters, and their (at the time) very active mailing list has public archives

>https://mailing-list-archive.cryptoanarchy.wiki

I don't feel like an authoritative source on this, but I'm sure other anons can point to specific essays that are similar in nature or topics. Sadly, I don't know of any books existing.


>>54968530

>Wealth of Nations

Does seem too large to tackle in a simple weekly bookclub, plus it's a tad bit old so it doesn't have the most up-to-date ideas. What about "What Has Government Done to Our Money" by Murray N. Rothbard? It is relatively short (~112 pages in the pdf with a thin page width) and it does deal with monetary theory, (hyper)inflation, money, and the government's actions to the economy.



Anonymous 05/15/23(Mon) 18:55:33 No.54975437
>>54975310

>plus it's a tad bit old

Old /= bad. Austrian economics is not a new idea and the people who came up with it really didn't leave much unsaid.


Anonymous 05/15/23(Mon) 22:41:39 No.54977977
>>54975437

Fair point, I rather meant that his ideas are antiquated by newer ones, namely by Austrian Economics. But anyhow, it is still long and not the easiest to read in my opinion.


new thread
Anonymous (ID: 6OXFLfdZ) 05/16/23(Tue) 05:03:40 No.54981401

>Book club

I'm reading Permanent Record at the moment, I know Snowjob is a ziontrash shill so I won't recommend it specifically.

Another book on the surveillance state or future of it could be relevant to Monero thoughbeit